Analyzing U.S. Treasury Holders: Q4 Trends and Investment Insights

Analyzing U.S. Treasury Holders: Q4 Trends and Investment Insights
Photo by Annie Spratt / Unsplash

In January, the U.S. national debt surged to its statutory ceiling of $36.2 trillion, a threshold set by Congress. Since 1917, managing the debt ceiling has become a recurring challenge in American governance. To avoid default, Congress has raised, extended, or revised the debt limit over 100 times. Each time the Treasury nears a cash shortfall, Congress ultimately reaches an agreement to raise the cap, allowing the government to borrow large sums to replenish its checking account — often resulting in a sharp, short-term increase in debt of hundreds of billions of dollars.

These U.S. Treasuries are held as interest-bearing assets by both domestic and international public and private entities. Amid ongoing divestment by some holders, the critical question remains: Who still holds U.S. government debt — and who is selling?

Breakdown of U.S. Treasury Holders

I. Intragovernmental Holdings – $7.29 Trillion

These are non-marketable securities held by U.S. government trust funds, including:

  • Federal Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund
  • Military Retirement Fund
  • Social Security Trust Fund
  • Disability Insurance Trust Fund
  • Medicare Trust Funds
  • Other government funds

II. Publicly Held Debt – $28.92 Trillion

This includes marketable securities held by investors globally:

  • Treasury Bills (≤1 year): $6.39 trillion
  • Treasury Notes (2–10 years): $14.6 trillion
  • Treasury Bonds (20–30 years): $4.8 trillion
  • TIPS (Inflation-Protected Securities): $2.0 trillion
  • Floating Rate Notes (FRNs): $0.63 trillion
  • Non-marketable savings bonds (e.g., Series I Bonds): $0.575 trillion

Foreign Holders – $8.5 Trillion (30.2% of Public Debt)

Foreign investors, including both the private sector and official institutions such as central banks, held $8.5 trillion of U.S. Treasuries:

  • Foreign private sector: $4.73 trillion
  • Foreign official institutions: $3.78 trillion

By Maturity:

  • Long-term securities: $7.31 trillion
  • Short-term Treasury bills: $1.2 trillion (14.1%)

Q4 Developments:

Foreign holders reduced their U.S. Treasury positions by $166 billion in Q4, a 1.9% decline from the Q3 peak of $8.69 trillion. Key sellers included:

  • Six Financial Hubs (UK, Belgium, Luxembourg, Switzerland, Cayman Islands, Ireland): -$60 billion
  • Japan: -$36 billion
  • Brazil: -$33 billion
  • India: -$28 billion
  • Eurozone (excluding Luxembourg, Belgium, Ireland): -$12 billion

Exception:

  • Canada bucked the trend, increasing its holdings by $11 billion
Canada made their U.S debt WAGMI moment

Top Foreign Holders (as of Q4):

  • Six Financial Hubs: $2.56 trillion
  • Eurozone (incl. Luxembourg, Belgium, Ireland): $1.79 trillion
  • Japan: $1.06 trillion
  • China & Hong Kong: $1.01 trillion

Notable Trends:

  • Many holdings via financial hubs reflect U.S. corporate offshore cash management strategies—e.g., Apple previously held large U.S. bond positions in Ireland.
  • The Eurozone has overtaken China as a major U.S. debt holder, while China and Hong Kong have consistently reduced exposure over the past decade.
  • Canada's holdings have tripled since the pandemic, reaching $379 billion.
  • Other key holders include Taiwan ($282B), India ($219B), and Brazil ($202B).

Domestic Holders – $20.33 Trillion (69.8% of Public Debt)

U.S.-based investors hold the majority of publicly traded Treasury securities. Here’s the breakdown and Q4 activity:

  • Mutual Funds: $5.5 trillion (19.3%)
    • Includes both bond and money market funds
    • Money Market Funds alone held $3.0 trillion, with $2.4 trillion in T-Bills
    • Q4 net purchases: +$335 billion
  • Federal Reserve: $4.29 trillion (15.2%)
    • Continued to unwind balance sheet via Quantitative Tightening (QT)
    • Q4 net reduction: -$93 billion
    • Since mid-2022, the Fed has offloaded $1.53 trillion in Treasuries, total assets down $2.2 trillion
Total Asset of the Federal Reserve
  • Households and Nonprofits: $2.68 trillion (9.5%)
    • Q4 net reduction: -$229 billion
  • Commercial Banks: $1.77 trillion (6.2%)
    • Includes U.S. chartered banks, foreign bank branches, and credit unions
    • Q4 net purchases: +$33 billion
  • State & Local Governments (incl. pensions): $2.07 trillion (7.3%)
    • Q4 net reduction: -$28 billion
  • Insurance Companies: $650 billion (2.3%)
    • Property & Casualty Insurers: $459 billion (doubled since Q4 2022; +$40B in Q4)
    • Life Insurers: $191 billion
  • ETFs: $554 billion (2.0%)
  • Private Pension Funds: $452 billion (1.6%)
    • Q4 net reduction: -$13 billion
  • Broker-Dealers: $408 billion (1.4%)
    • Q4 net increase: +$72 billion
  • Government-Sponsored Enterprises (e.g., Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac): $227 billion (0.8%)
    • Q4 net increase: +$36 billion
  • Other Domestic Investors: $417 billion
    • U.S. non-financial corporations (ex-foreign holdings): $114 billion
    • Non-corporate businesses: $87 billion
    • Holding companies: $130 billion
    • Central clearing counterparties: $86 billion
  • Non-marketable Securities (Series I & EE Bonds): $575 billion (2.1%)

Conclusion and Investment Implications

The composition of U.S. Treasury holders shifted meaningfully in Q4. Foreign entities, especially traditional buyers like Japan and major offshore financial centers, collectively reduced holdings by $166 billion. In contrast, Canada and U.S. institutions such as money market funds and banks increased exposure.

Meanwhile, households and pension funds trimmed positions. The Fed continued its QT program, selling $93 billion in Treasuries, further tightening liquidity conditions.

Each liability is someone else’s asset. While individuals or companies can discharge debt through bankruptcy, governments cannot. The only path to reducing sovereign debt burdens is robust inflation and sustained economic growth.

Inflation is easy to generate; growth, especially in mature economies, is not. Excessive inflation, if left unchecked, can destabilize markets—and currencies. If debt is not managed responsibly, the end result will likely be persistently elevated inflation. We are only beginning to repay past excesses. And governments rarely lose.

The credit risk of Treasuries (i.e., default risk) is virtually zero. But when investing in long-term securities (not just Treasuries), other risks emerge. First, inflation may rise and exceed your interest income, leading to insufficient real returns. Second, if market yields rise, bond prices may fall before maturity, potentially causing a loss if sold early. Even if held to maturity, the principal is returned in devalued dollars. If interest income cannot sufficiently offset inflation and other risks, it becomes a failed investment.

The bond market hates inflation.

"Fixed-coupon bonds provide no protection against runaway currency" - Warren Buffett

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Investment decisions should be made based on individual financial circumstances, risk tolerance, and objectives. Always consult with a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Investing involves risk, including potential loss of principal.

Read more

基本面 vs 资金流量

基本面 vs 资金流量

一般投资者在投资里的思路与方式: 基本面投资:我要购买某项资产,我觉得在一些明确的假设下获得可量化的收益(现金收益、消费效益或货币效益)。这些收益构成了该资产的内在价值。 资金流量投资:我相信有人会以更高的价格从我手里买走这些资产 你会押注哪个? 基本面和资金流量 💡你押注的全部都是未来不是当下 基本面投资的特点: * 下行风险小:有一定的下行保护,因为有内在价值支撑,可能体现在资产的市场价格和产生现金流的能力上。 * 上行限制:基本面投资会错过大部分暴涨的机会,你会错过1000倍的狗狗币,而且经常过早卖出基本面仓位(没人知道$PLTR的今天) 这两种投资风格最终都依赖于对未来的预测,而你的预测可能总是对的,也可能错的。 你赌的是未来的基本面(明天的收入) 和未来的资金流(我相信 X 明年将获得 Y 美元的净买家流入) 这两种情况,最终重要的是你做出这些预测的信心有多大。实际上,基本面投资往往更容易做出自信的预测。例如: * 基本面——你可以观察到像谷歌这样的企业或像 Hyperliquid 这样的协议持续产生高收入。结合对核心业务的了解,你可以合理地

By Lyricon Research
稳定币会胜利,但不会很快胜利

稳定币会胜利,但不会很快胜利

稳定币的真正价值,我认为很多人还没有完全理解。 大家都在讨论稳定币如何改善现有支付轨道,如何连接传统金融基础设施,但这种想法其实低估了稳定币的颠覆性潜力。稳定币不仅仅是对现有系统的改进,它们让公司能够完全绕过传统金融轨道,把整个支付价值链压缩成一个简单的账本转账。 所有的交易都只是账本记录而已。 历史 看看现在的支付系统是怎么到今天的,就明白为什么稳定币这么革命性了。 1950年的转折点 现代支付系统可以追溯到1950年,Frank McNamara和他的合伙人创立了第一张多用途信用卡Diners Club。在此之前,大家要么用现金,要么和商家单独签信用协议,非常麻烦。Diners Club成为了商家和持卡人之间的中介,这是现代支付的开始。 美国银行的大胆尝试 美国银行看到了机会,决定做大规模的信用卡项目。他们直接给加州200万中产阶级寄去了未经申请的信用卡,可以在2万多家商户使用。 结果呢?一团糟。违约率超过20%,欺诈横行,差点把整个项目搞垮。但是由于监管限制,美国银行不能自己扩张,只能把技术授权给其他银行,这样就形成了第一个发卡银行网络。 合作模式的诞生

By Lyricon Research
Strategy(微策略)的资产负债表革命

Strategy(微策略)的资产负债表革命

比特币不再仅仅是个人投资。企业资产负债表上正以前所未有的规模堆积着比特币,而没有哪家公司比 Strategy(通常被称为 MicroStrategy,由 Michael Saylor 领导)更能体现这种转变。 Strategy在比特币金融领域的地位 没有其他公司在比特币持有量方面能与 Strategy 相提并论。仅凭这些数字就足以说明这家公司的影响力: * 目前持有量: 592,100 比特币(价值约 620 亿美元) * 债务和优先股:债务 82 亿美元,优先股 30 亿美元(总承诺金额约为 110 亿美元) * 杠杆率:约为15-17%,适中 你从传统媒体、华尔街日报听到过这种说法:“他们的策略是杠杆化的,举债购买比特币” 说的没什么大问题,但如果缩小范围看这些数字,从财务角度来看,这些数字看起来非常健康,相对于未来的负债,你拥有很多资产。非常可持续,Strategy几乎不可能会陷入无力偿还债务的境地,比特币的价格将得跌到 13,

By Lyricon Research
Circle:黎明前的海啸,稳定币即将冲向主流

Circle:黎明前的海啸,稳定币即将冲向主流

Jeremy Allaire 2013年成立circle的时候,很多技术还没有现在这么成熟,最初的想法是在互联网上建立一个美元协议,这样circle可以在开放,无需许可的区块链上使用完整的数字美元。 核心思想是如果技术能成熟,数字美元的存储和移动价值将成为一种互联网上的服务,存储和移动价值的边际效应会变为零,与此同时,货币流通速度将在实体经济中增加,这是circle公司的使命。 野蛮扩张的市场 现如今的稳定币作为受监管的链上法定货币,正在以非常野蛮的速度增长: Visa的预测是到2030年,正常情况下应有1.6万亿美元的稳定币供应,乐观情况下有3万亿美元的稳定币供应。这是互联网上相当大的市场,潜在的机会也是巨大的。 2018年USDC问世,circle构建了一个市场中立的基础设施,作为一个协议,开发人员可以在这个基础上构建,circle通过与开发者合作构建了一个稳定币网络,在这个链上大家一起构建了一个流动性网络。 2020年开始,增长速度惊人,而且还在快速加速。USDC 是过去大约 15 到 16 个月中增长最快的全球稳定币,自 2024 年初以来,USDC 增长了

By Lyricon Research